DT Fine Art

  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Archive for May 1st, 2012

    New Season for Fishing Licenses Begins April 1

    Tuesday, May 1st, 2012

    By Cindy Denby

    #13;

    Now that the weather has warmed up, many Michigan residents are probably thinking about planning fishing trips in the next few months. Fishing is one of Michigans greatest pastimes and to make sure residents are ready, the Department of Natural Resources is reminding anglers that April 1 beings a new license season. Prices remain the same as in 2011 and options for licenses include 24-hour, 72-hour, season-long restricted and season-long all species.

    #13;

    Money from fishing licenses funds a variety of activities including education and outreach to the public, information distribution, fish stocking, habitat rehabilitation and protection and fish management work. Buying a fishing license even if you don’t plan to fish can make a big difference for the future health of our Great Lakes.

    #13;

    To purchase a fishing license, residents can make the purchase in person at your local license retailer or DNR Operations Service Center, use the online e-license system (www.mdnr-elicense.com) or from your smart phone visit www.mi.gov/fish. A drivers license number and credit card are required to make the purchase online or via phone.

    #13;

    Most residents probably don’t realize that Michigan was part of the War of 1812, but now  more than 200 years later, volunteers can enlist to help commemorate the war. The Michigan Commission on the Commemoration of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 is looking for residents and communities to plan ceremonies for mid-June to mark the 200th anniversary of declaring war on Great Britain.

    #13;

    Interested communities and residents can visit www.michigan.gov/war1812 to access event registration forms for submission, an event program template and further details to assist in developing event ideas. Completed forms and questions can be emailed to Dr. James McConnell, War of 1812 historian and commission secretary, at jam1776@sbcglobal.net.

    #13;

    If you have any questions or need assistance with any state issues, please call me toll free at 866-828-4863 or via email at CindyDenby@house.mi.gov. 

    TEXT-S&P rates X5 Finance

    Tuesday, May 1st, 2012

    (The following statement was released by the rating agency)

    Overview
    — OOO X5 Finance is a finance subsidiary of Russias largest grocery
    retail chain, X5 Retail Group.
    — We see the likelihood that X5 Retail Group would provide parental
    support to X5 Finance as high.
    — We are affirming our B+ corporate credit rating on X5 Retail Group
    NV
    — We are assigning our B+ long-term rating to X5 Finance, equal with
    the rating on X5 Retail Group NV
    — We are also assigning a 3 recovery rating to X5 Finances RUB9
    billion unsecured notes due 2014 and RUB8 billion unsecured notes due 2016,
    and affirming the B+ issue rating on these notes, and removing them from
    CreditWatch negative.
    — The stable outlook on the long-term rating mirrors the outlook on X5
    Retail Group.

    Rating Action
    On April 27, 2011, Standard Poors Ratings Services affirmed its B+
    long-term corporate credit rating on X5 Retail Group NV and assigned its
    B+ long-term corporate credit rating to OOO X5 Finance, the finance
    subsidiary of X5 Retail Group NV (B+/Stable/–). The outlook on both
    entities is stable.

    We assigned a 3 recovery rating to X5 Finances existing Russian ruble (RUB)
    9 billion and RUB8 billion unsecured notes due 2014 and 2016. The B+ issue
    ratings on these notes were affirmed and removed from CreditWatch with
    negative implications, where they were placed on Feb. 10, 2011.
    Rationale
    The B+ issue ratings on the bonds reflect the B+ issuer credit rating and
    our 3 recovery rating.

    We equalize the rating on OOO X5 Finance with that on the ultimate parent X5
    Retail Group because we see the likelihood that X5 Retail Group would provide
    parental support to X5 Finance as high. Our view is underpinned by the
    following:
    — X5 Retail Group guarantees all the debt of X5 Finance. Although the
    suretyship provided by X5 Retail Group NV doesnt fully meet our criteria on
    guarantees, we nevertheless see it as an important sign of X5 Retail Groups
    willingness to support its finance subsidiaries. The proceeds of the issued
    bonds are lent on to the various companies within the group.
    — The finance subsidiaries are closely associated with X5 Retail Group
    and if one of them were to default, it would limit X5 Retail Groups access to
    financial markets.
    — X5 Retail Group has 100% indirect ownership and full management
    control of the financial subsidiary.
    — There is a cross-default clause with X5 Finances bilateral and
    syndicated loans.

    The suretyship prepared in accordance with the Russian law and provided by X5
    Retail Group NV for the bonds issued by X5 Finance doesnt fully meet our
    criteria on guarantees, in our view. Notably, under the surety agreement:
    — The guarantor will repay the debt only after it receives a request
    from the bondholder, which might take more than the five days required by our
    criteria.
    — The guarantor has to pay only the difference between the amount
    payable and the amount already paid by the issuer.
    — The guarantor has the right to terminate the suretyship, if the
    issuers obligations are changed and such change leads to an enlargement of
    responsibility or any other unfavorable consequences.
    — The guarantor does not waive its rights of set-off or counterclaim.

    The rating on X5 Retail Group NV, which owns Russias largest grocery retail
    network, reflects what we see as the groups aggressive growth strategy and
    financial policy and exposure to a volatile emerging market economy. Standard
    Poors does not factor into the rating major unforeseen debt-financed
    acquisitions or changes to shareholder remuneration.

    Liquidity
    We revised X5s liquidity assessment to adequate from less than adequate,
    reflecting a longer track record of prudent liquidity management. X5s ratio
    of liquidity sources to uses equaled 1.24x as of Dec. 31, 2011.

    Liquidity sources are comprised of the following:
    — Surplus cash reserves of about $230 million;
    — Undrawn long-term committed lines totaling $264 million, although
    available funds under both committed and uncommitted lines totaled $1.65
    billion; and
    — Operating cash flow of about $1.14 billion in 2012

    Liquidity uses are represented by:
    — Short-term debt of $918 million; and
    — Capital spending of $400 million under our conservative credit
    scenario, which factors in the companys flexibility to decrease capital
    expenditures in response to a deteriorating operating environment or
    tightening credit markets.

    On Dec 31, 2011, X5 was in compliance with the covenants for its syndicated
    loan and had adequate headroom. X5s liquidity benefits from the companys
    relationship with several large foreign and Russian state-owned and commercial
    banks.

    Flexibility provided by the largely discretionary nature of the groups
    capital-investment requirements also supports X5s liquidity, in our view.

    Recovery analysis
    The issue rating on the RUB8 billion Series 4 notes due 2016 (2016 notes)
    and RUB9 billion Series 1 notes due 2014 (2014 notes) issued by X5 Finance
    is B+, the same as the corporate credit rating on X5 Finance. The recovery
    rating on these debt instruments is 3, indicating our expectation of
    meaningful (50%-70%) recovery in the event of a payment default. The 2014
    notes and 2016 notes are unsecured obligations of X5 Finance.

    X5 Retail Group NV provides support for the notes issued by X5 Finance in
    the form of suretyship agreements governed by Russian law. We believe that the
    suretyship undertakings prepared in accordance with the Russian law and
    provided by X5 Retail Group NV are a weaker form of support than on-demand
    guarantees and do not fully meet Standard Poors criteria on guarantees for
    rating substitution purposes (see the reasons listed in the Rationale
    above).

    Notwithstanding the above, we believe that the surety agreements, combined
    with the factors that justify our equalization of the corporate credit rating
    on X5 Finance with that on X5 Retail Group, have sufficient strength for us to
    assign a recovery rating to these instruments in line with our estimation of
    the recovery prospects for the note holders.

    We note that some debt facilities benefit from a structurally senior position
    to the rated notes. However, the presence of surety agreements and
    intercompany loans partly offsets the structural subordination of the notes.
    For the purpose of our recovery analysis, we have assumed that most debt
    facilities would rank equally with the notes at our simulated point of default.

    To calculate recovery, we simulate a hypothetical default scenario, triggered
    mainly by increasing competition, negative foreign currency movements, and an
    inability to refinance maturing debt in 2014, with EBITDA declining to about
    $805 million.

    We have valued X5 Retail Group as a going concern, given its leading market
    position in Russia. Using a market-multiple approach, we estimate X5 Retail
    Groups stressed enterprise value at about $4.0 billion at our hypothetical
    point of default.

    We then deduct about $900 million of priority liabilities, consisting of
    enforcement costs, and debt at recently acquired Open Joint Stock Co. Trade
    House Kopeyka (NR). The net residual value available for the various debt
    instruments, assumed to amount to about $4.7 billion, is about $3.1 billion.
    The recovery prospects are thus in the 50%-70% range.

    Outlook
    The stable outlook reflects that on X5 Retail Group. We expect the rating on
    X5 Finance to change in line with the ratings on X5 Retail Group NV

    Related Criteria And Research
    — Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global
    Corporate Issuers, Sept. 28, 2011
    — Criteria Guidelines For Recovery Ratings On Global Industrials
    Issuers Speculative-Grade Debt, Aug. 10, 2009
    — Criteria Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded,
    May 27, 2009
    — Key credit factors: Business and Financial Risks in the Retail
    Industry, Sept. 18, 2008
    — 2008 Corporate Criteria: Analytical Methodology, April 15, 2008

    Ratings List
    New Rating

    OOO X5 Finance
    Corporate Credit Rating B+/Stable/–

    Ratings Affirmed

    X5 Retail Group NV
    Corporate Credit Rating B+/Stable/–

    Ratings Affirmed; CreditWatch/Outlook Action; New Rating
    To From
    OOO X5 Finance
    Senior Unsecured
    RUB8 bil 18.46% puttable bnds ser 4* B+ B+ /Watch Neg
    due 06/02/2016
    Recovery Rating 3 NR
    RUB9 bil bnds ser 1 due 07/01/2014* B+ B+ /Watch Neg
    Recovery Rating 3 NR

    *Guaranteed by: X5 retail Group NV

    (Caryn Trokie, New York Ratings Unit)

    Real issue

    Tuesday, May 1st, 2012

    The United States will enter the heat of the presidential campaign in September. When it does, the debate should not turn on dogs in kennels lashed to car roofs or whether the incumbent is a Muslim who ate dogs when he lived in Indonesia as a child, or equally inane questions. If, as the American people say, this election is about the economy, then the debate should really turn on the perfect storm that Washington, DC, has set in motion for the first days of 2013 and how to solve it.

    At the end of 2012, the Bush tax cuts and the Obama payroll tax cut are set to expire. Together, that would raise taxes by about $350 billion a year. At the same time, mandatory spending cuts would chop the federal budget by about $100 billion a year, slashing benefit programs and defense spending equally. They are the result of failed attempts by Congress to come up with more rational plans to cut the budget deficit last year.