Uncategorized


0

(Update: Coach Jim Harbaugh expressed surprised that the media did not attend practice today. You were welcome out there, Harbaugh said. However, the 49ers did not take the media past the locked gates and to the practice field until the team was in their post-practice huddle and walking off the field. Harbaugh disputed a teams spokesmans contention that there was no access because the walk-through ran long. The teams official participation report was the same as yesterdays, mainly that tight end Delanie Walker did not practice and Harbaugh later said Walker wont play Saturday.)

The largest press contingent of the season is present at the 49ers facility. Nobody is apparently going to see the 49ers on the practice field, however.

The media window was slated for when the 49ers stretch after their walk-through session, at approximately 12:30 pm A team spokesman said the walk-through ran late, the stretching session was eliminated and the 49ers went straight into team drills, from which the media has been banned all season (as allowed under league rules).

Coach Jim Harbaugh is expected to address the media at 1:55 pm, after which the locker room will be open for 45 minutes. No media access is scheduled for Friday, as is the 49ers norm a day before the game.

Here is the NFLs media policy regarding access at practice:

Following the completion of Week 2 of the NFL preseason schedule through the regular season and playoffs, daily practice (Monday through Friday) must be open to local media (those who regularly cover the team) for at least the first 30 minutes or until the start of team work. It is permissible to limit the videotaping or photographing of certain portions of practice. Starting the week prior to the opening of the regular season, clubs are required to designate on the NFL Intranet site and issue to local media the names of those players who missed any portion of 11-on-11 team or individual work on the specified days noted in the NFL Injury Report policy.

The until the start of team work is a loophole that has forced the media into abreviated views throughout this season, and access two days before games typically has consisted of only a few minutes of watching players stretch (and not practicing).

Meanwhile in New Orleans, linebacker Jonathan Vilma (knee), receiver Lance Moore (hamstring) and tight end John Gilmore (toe) did not practice, according to the Times-Picayunes Mike Triplett. Safety Roman Harper (ankle) practiced in limited fashion after sitting out Wednesdays session. Linebacker Jonathan Casillas (knee) also was limited, Triplett reported.

The Saints will fly to San Francisco later today, and coach Sean Payton told Triplett that Vilma should be back for Fridays walk-through at Candlestick.

0

PERTH: The on-pitch beer party by the WACA staff, hours before the Perth match, is an insult to Test cricket and a political disaster, a media report said.

An Indian TV channel showed footage of a few men and women sitting and drinking beer on the WACA pitch, the night before the Perth Test between India and Australia.

The WACA curator had said it was just a customary celebration after a good work ahead of the match.

However, a report in Daily Telegraph slammed the behaviour by the WACA staff.

Australians, it seems, will drink anytime anywhere without any respect or regard. Is there anything more sacred or central to a Test match than the pitch on the evening before the match? the report asked.

What an insult to Test cricket and the visiting Indian team, it added.

The report lauded Curator Cameron Sutherlands stupendous job in preparing a lively pitch for the match but was critical of his and his teams behaviour.

Curator Cam Sutherland, who has done a terrific job rebuilding the WACA pitch into a fast and lively strip, went out into the middle and took the covers off for 10 minutes to check his handiwork. Staff having a traditional pre-Test drink followed him out there. No big deal they thought.

But this was and is a political disaster.

Malcolm Conn stated in his article that the incident would affect Australias image and also took a dig at the so called heavy security at WACA.

The more hysterical, nationalist elements of a large and diverse Indian cricket media will jump on every opportunity to reinforce the undercurrent of Australia as an arrogant, racist country.

So when overzealous and heavy-handed security at the WACA is imposed on those outside the fence, including the 100 strong Indian media corps, what are they to think of Australians allowed to wander around on the pitch drinking?

The writer was also critical of WACA chief executive Graeme Woods remarks that his staff did nothing wrong.

Wood should know better than most about international incidents. He was part of the Australian touring team to Pakistan in 1988 which threatened to return home because of perceived biased umpiring.

Surely Wood cant honestly believe that vision of his staff drinking on the Test pitch leading up to one of the very few big days in the year at his ground is the type of image Australia should be presenting to the cricket world.

0

SCOTTSDALE, AZ, Jan 13, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) –
EmpowHER, an award-winning social health company for women, today
announces new social media properties focusing around the business of
marketing to women, and the emergence of Health 3.0 — the social
health movement driven by peer health via social networking and
health information sharing, and how marketers and healthcare
executives can understand and capitalize on this new era.

Since its launch in 2008, EmpowHER has achieved a leading position in
the women’s online health and wellness space. Today, the company is
recognized as the fastest growing social health community for women.
EmpowHER Media expects to reach nearly 40M female health consumers on
EmpowHER.com, and another 200M through a powerful syndication network
that includes a Who’s Who of the Web like: Yahoo! Health, AOL, Shine
by Yahoo!, Hearst’s RealAge, Rodale’s Healthy Living Network,
HealthGuru Media, Howdini, Fox News Health and others. This
represents 400% growth from the more than 60M women EmpowHER reached
onsite and through syndication in 2011. Health and wellness brands
and health care industry professionals can follow EmpowHER Media
through its comprehensive social media platforms including: the
EmpowHER Media LinkedIn group — where professionals can engage in
discussions and ask questions; the @EmpowHERMedia twitter handle,
where marketers can stay updated on industry stats, latest reports
and key insights in health care and social media, EmpowHER Insights:
Marketing to Women Blog, and a health marketing Facebook page.

“Social Health will reshape the marketing mix for health and wellness
brands and healthcare marketers in the next several years, and
EmpowHER is a pioneer in social health,” said Thom Brodeur
(@thombempowher), Executive Vice President, EmpowHER Media. “Women
consume 80% of the premium health content on the Web; more than a
third of them seek peer health communities for discussing their
health and wellness issues, and they make 90% of all health and
wellness buying decisions for the home. Social health platforms that
provide a safe-haven for women will be where health and wellness
marketers shift the majority of their online marketing spend in 2012
and beyond. One-directional consumer marketing from health portals
and networks is the health marketer’s past. Brands and practitioners
who plan to gain share of mind and wallet will win in social health
environments where they’re participating in consumer discussions not
talking at consumers.”

EmpowHER owns the largest original women’s health content library on
the Web with more than 130,000 videos, articles and user generated
comments and posts through the company’s proprietary ASK and SHARE
social health features. The company’s active peer health community
boasts 280 affinity groups where community members discuss everything
from breast cancer treatment to healthy eating to reproductive and
sexual health. The hallmark is women talking to and helping each
other manage their personal health and wellness journeys.

“We are creating opportunities for our sponsoring clients and the
brands who want to reach, engage and influence female health
consumers more effectively,” said Jamie Glass (@EmpowHERJamie),
Senior Vice President of Sales & Client Services, EmpowHER Media.
“Brands need a social media and digital marketing partner who
understands the statistical data, how to use social platforms for
health and wellness promotion and values the relationship with female
health consumers. We do this every day. EmpowHER knows female health
consumers, and more importantly, we understand how to match brands
with these women through powerful, ROI-driven marketing solutions.”

Visit EmpowHERMedia.com to learn more about the evolution of consumer
behavior on the web from Health 1.0 to Health 3.0 — more
specifically, social health.

Click here to view this release on EmpowHER.com and share it with
your social networks.

About EmpowHER Media
EmpowHER Media is an award-winning,
HON-certified, social health company for women. The Company’s
flagship — EmpowHER.com — is the third most visited women’s health
and wellness destination on the Web (comScore Media Metrix). As the
online home for female health consumers, EmpowHER.com offers a unique
value proposition of a peer health community and premium, original
women’s health and wellness content. Health care professionals,
brands and agency professionals rely on EmpowHER Media for reaching
the most influential health and wellness buyer on the Internet –
women. EmpowHER reached more than 60 million women onsite and through
syndication in 2011, and expects to reach more than 250 million in
2012.

Image Available:

http://www2.marketwire.com/mw/frame_mw?attachid=1854105

Press Contact for EmpowHER
Lauren Moye
EmpowHER
(971) 832-1456
Email Contact

SOURCE: EmpowHER

http://www2.marketwire.com/mw/emailprcntct?id=FDEBEF48B24A004B

Copyright 2012 Marketwire, Inc., All rights reserved.

0

A bit of a splash erupted on the Web yesterday in the form of photos showing a boat displaying two hammerheads. One was a shark. The other was the celebrity, Rosie ODonnell.

The Web quickly lit up with attacks on Rosie, saying among other things that because she brought her kids fishing for sharks, she was a bad mom.

Well, maybe. But lets dissect just a little. Im willing to cut her some slack.

First, although Im a lifelong ocean conservationist, I am going to resist quite piling onto the attack. And Ill tell you why; Ive done something rather similar, as Ill explain. Then, for what its worth, Ill tell you the two things I found distasteful. But before we get to that, Ill tell you what I thought was positive about the story and what it says about us all — in a good way.

It was good was that people attacked Rosie for killing a shark. They didnt attack her for being liberal, an adoptive gay parent, or a lady fisherman. Im just a few years older than Rosie, and I can remember when a woman on a boat was a rarity. Any woman on a boat unaccompanied by a man was so unheard of that I rather vividly remember the first time I saw such a thing (I was 18, and she, early 20s, was wearing a rather nice halter top). Further, Rosie let her daughter fight the shark — a near-unthinkable incursion into what only a few years ago was a nearly unbreachable boys bastion of angling. So good for us — we focused on the part of the person and the story that mattered: her and the shark.

Now, about that, Ill cut her just a little slack. For about 20 years, I did a lot of shark fishing. And on more occasions than I can recall, I took kids with me. There are few things as exciting for a kid as throwing chunks of fish to a large shark swimming around a boat, or feeling its incredible power on the end of a line. I still get a kick out of it. One major difference is that we released almost all the sharks we ever caught. (And we didnt just cut the wire leader; I had a hook remover.) And the several sharks we killed, we ate. (I understood less about mercury then; sharks have a lot of it.) I killed my last shark, a mako, in 1997, and no sooner had I tied it to the boats cleat than I knew it would be my last. Sharks were getting scarcer. (In my book, The View From Lazy Point, that capture and my change of heart is chronicled.) I am not ashamed of what I did then, but I wouldnt do it now. The sharks, and the world, have changed.

Ms. ODonnell, by contrast, was unrepentant, defiant, and profane in response to her shark-hugging critics. I would have preferred her to seem a little more evolved on things ocean, explaining that it was years ago and she now understands things differently. Instead, in her Twitter tweets she defended the killing by saying that hammerhead shark meat can be used to bait crab traps. Well, so can human corpses. And that reminds me of a good joke from Maine, but thats for another time.*

Probably most distasteful about the incident is that the boat captain put these photos on his web site after the state banned killing of all three species of hammerheads. That ban just went into effect January 1. Its probably no coincidence that he posted years old photos right after a ban for the species. It shows disdain for the sharks hes made a living from (where I live, a lot of boats carry paying customers for catch-and-release shark fishing), disrespect for the new law, and a certain macho desperation in trying to defy changing public attitudes towards ocean wildlife. His web site also displays a rather remarkable congenital boastfulness and an penchant for unusual capitalization (We are a better Charter Fishing Boat than the Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Boats on the East Coast and in the Florida Keys, including the fleet of Deep Sea Fishing Boats in Key West). All of which add up to making him yet another hammerhead in his own story.

Though killing the shark a few years ago is different than catching a protected species just after a fishing ban has been instated, its not really a ton better. Its been obvious for 20 years that hammerhead sharks were among the first to get scarce after the global shark fin trade got out of control in the 1980s. (Shark fin is used as a thickener in Chinese shark fin soup, where part of the appeal is the idea of imbibing the strength and ferocity of the shark through its pulverized fins, an idea on par with thinking youd stay warm if you ate polar bear fur.) Since I started shark fishing, I never would have considered killing a hammerhead.

I did, however, see hammerheads — and various other large sharks — virtually disappear before my eyes. When I first started fishing for sharks off Long Island, NY, in the 1980s, hammerheads were common. One day I hailed a distant boat over the radio to ask how he was doing, and he replied, Plenty of hammerheads. Those days, long gone.

One boat, and one celebrity are nothing compared to the millions of sharks killed worldwide annually in commercial fisheries. But lets face it; it looks bad. Ms. ODonnell might want to consider: 1) not killing more sharks, 2) taking her kids scuba diving, 3) fishing for dinner and going home when theyve caught enough, 4) getting a nice camera and good binoculars and, when the urge to go shark fishing strikes, going birding instead. It would all seem well suited to her otherwise caring and compassionate public persona.

*Oh, yes, now about that joke… Two lobstermen are hauling a line of traps when, strangely, up comes a big mass of lobsters that simply falls onto the deck; the mate suddenly realizes in horror that the lobsters were clinging to a human corpse that has somehow become tangled on their line. In panic he yells to the captain, What should I do? Surprised at the question, the captain replies, Hell, set im again.

0

Alexander Zemlianichenko/AP

Relying on social media, Russian activists are attempting to organize more mass rallies against the Russian government. Here, protesters staged a huge rally in Moscow on Dec. 24, 2011, alleging vote rigging in parliamentary polls.

text size A A A

January 13, 2012

Russia’s largest anti-government demonstrations since the Soviet breakup of 1991 are being organized and driven by a force that didn’t exist two decades ago — social media.

In recent years, protests have been relatively rare, and Russians who got their news from state-run television essentially saw one narrative — one that relentlessly extolled the virtues of the country’s leaders, particularly Vladimir Putin.

But demonstrators took to the streets last month after parliamentary elections that were widely seen as fraudulent. And activists are trying to maintain that momentum with slick Internet videos that satirize and disparage Russia’s government.

One of those videos welcomes viewers to a mental asylum, where the inmates vote for Putin, the current prime minister. Putin has already served two terms as president, from 2000 to 2008. His decision to run for a third term in March served as a rallying point for his critics, along with irregularities in the parliamentary voting.

Some 50 million Russians are now on the Internet, absorbing these videos and using it as a forum to vent their frustration over government corruption, the top-down political system, and alleged election fraud.

Internet, Facebook, Twitter and other social media helped mobilize the protests last month. The demonstrations were enormous. Tens of thousands protested in Moscow on Dec. 24, with some estimates putting the figure at as many as 100,000.

Planning The Next Protest

The next demonstration is set for Feb. 4, and organizers are busy preparing for it on the Internet.

Alexey Kozlov, 38, peers at his laptop computer, opened to a page on Yandex, the Russian equivalent of Google. Kozlov, an executive at an investment firm in Moscow, is helping to organize online contributions for the protest rallies.

The money will pay for hot meals, a proper stage and sound equipment. Kozlov says contributions have been flooding in from all over Russia. The average contribution is 1,000 rubles, about $30. Donations shot up after Putin charged that the rallies were being backed by foreigners.

“When our authorities begin to say that this is money from the State Department, I think that the more than 5,000 people who really transferred the money, they became very angry about this,” he said.

Kozlov says organizers are also using the Internet to get input from citizens on who should speak at the rallies.

Kozlov says he sees the use of social media in Russia growing and becoming bolder. Last month, video footage showing fraudulent practices at polling stations during parliamentary elections lit up the Internet.

New Video Of Alleged Fraud

This week, Igor Drandin, a 31-year-old Web designer, recorded and posted a video showing about two dozen university students allegedly falsifying election registration forms.

Drandin says it’s useless to complain to the Central Election Commission about the forgeries. The video is more powerful. Drandin is a member of an activist group called Democratic Choice, which will start training people to be observers during the March presidential election.

“We’ll certainly recommend [they] get a video camera to record everything,” he says. “Because this is the most efficient way to struggle against those cheaters. They are afraid of video.”

All this has caught the government off guard, says Nikolay Petrov, an analyst at the Carnegie Moscow Center.

“Two months ago, Putin was saying that the Internet doesn’t deserve any real attention, and it’s the place where pornography dominates,” Petrov says. “Now he’s eager to order a bigger presence of the government and authorities in general on the Internet.”

But it’s been a rocky start — Putin’s own website was unveiled Thursday. The comments section quickly filled with calls for him to resign. Those comments later disappeared from the site.

 

0

Walt Disney Studios has tapped former Participant Media prexy Ricky Strauss as head of marketing, ending a monthslong search to replace MT Carney, who announced her departure last week after a rocky 18-month tenure.

Strauss, who spent 16 years as a marketing and production exec at Sony, comes into the job with considerably more experience than had Carney, a Hollywood newcomer who was chosen to bring out-of-the-box thinking to Disneys campaigns.

Though Strauss is a seasoned studio marketing vet, his selection by no means signals that Disney Studios chairman Rich Ross is abandoning that strategy. Ross is keen on alternative marketing through targeted outreach, social media and partnerships, a tack that Strauss took at Participant, known for its unique, socially conscious campaigns.

At Participant, Strauss had worked with the Disney team in recent months in overseeing marketing and outreach for the Touchstone-distribbed DreamWorks hit The Help.

I am happy to welcome Ricky Strauss to The Walt Disney Studios family. With 25 years of industry experience, he brings a deep understanding of all aspects of the film business as well as incredible skill in branding and cutting-edge marketing, Ross said in a statement. He will undoubtedly raise the studios creative bar as we enter 2012 and look ahead at showcasing a spectacular slate of films to audiences around the world.

In his role, Strauss will oversee global marketing for promotions, publicity, research and synergy across all distribution channels for motion pictures released under the Walt Disney Pictures (including Walt Disney Animation and Pixar Animation), Marvel Studios, and Touchstone Pictures banners, including DreamWorks Studios pics released through Touchstone.

His mandate will be to carry out Ross wish to make marketing dollars work more efficiently and last longer through campaigns that go beyond traditional ad buys and physical marketing materials.

Disney, Pixar, Ma rvel, and DreamWorks Studios are among the worlds best and brightest brands, said Strauss. I look forward now to getting to work with the exceptional team at Disney, doing some of the most innovative marketing in the industry.

After Carney failed to acclimate to Hollywoods insular culture, it comes as no surprise that Carneys replacement has a deep resume in the film biz. Strauss previously worked as a senior marketing executive and senior veep of production at Columbia/TriStar Pictures. The appointment of Carney, a marketing vet who was schooled in new media but had no film background, turned out to be a major misstep for Disney. She was one of Ross first major hires, appointed in April 2010, on the heels of his promotion from Disney Channels Worldwide boss to the film studio chief post in October 2009.

Before joining Participant in 2005, Strauss founded Sony-based Ricochet Entertainment, where he exec produced the Cameron Diaz film The Sweetest Thing, among other projects.

When Carney was hired two years ago, skeptics questioned whether a person without a background in studio marketing could fill the role. Rumors of her exit began almost immediately, but studio execs repeatedly said they were happy with her work. Since she signed on, Pirates of the Carribean: On Stranger Tides passed $1 billion worldwide, while Cars 2 hit more than $500 million — but there were also flops, most notably Mars Needs Moms.

Strauss comes on board with elaborate campaign for sci-fier John Carter already in place with a March 9 launch. Key upcoming titles for Disney are Marvels The Avengers on May 4, Pixars Brave on June 12, The Odd Life of Timothy Green on Aug. 15, Tim Burtons Frankenweenie on Oct. 5 and Wreck-it Ralph on Nov. 2.

Click here for more film news on Variety.com.

0

The online activist group known as Anonymous, which has targeted opponents of the Occupy Wall Street movement and businesses that stopped providing services to WikiLeaks, has set its sights on a new adversary: media executives.

In protest of antipiracy legislation currently being considered by Congress, the group has posted online documents that reveal personal information about Jeffrey L. Bewkes, chairman and chief executive of Time Warner, and Sumner M. Redstone, who controls Viacom and the CBS Corporation. Those companies, like almost every major company in the media and entertainment industry, have championed the Stop Online Piracy Act, the House of Representatives bill, known as SOPA, and its related Senate bill, called Protect IP

The documents, culled from various databases, included Mr. Bewkes’s home addresses and phone numbers, and encouraged users to bombard the company and its executives with e-mails, faxes and phone calls. Mr. Bewkes has received intimidating phone calls and a barrage of e-mails, according to supporters of the legislation who have knowledge about the matter but are not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

The documents also included the corporate contact information for a range of companies including NBCUniversal, Sony Pictures Entertainment and the Walt Disney Company.

A Disney spokeswoman said neither the company nor its chief executive, Robert A. Iger, had received threats. Time Warner declined to comment. The file that was posted regarding Mr. Redstone has details about his family, home and career but does not include private contact information. A Viacom spokeswoman declined to comment.

Anonymous, a loosely organized collective of so-called hacktivists, has called its effort “Operation Hiroshima.” It began on Jan. 1, when the group dropped a trove of documents on Web sites that facilitate anonymous publishing, like Pastebin.com and Scribd.com. The documents included information about media executives and government figures like Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and New York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly, and data on corporations and government entities that the group opposes.

“They should feel threatened,” said Barrett Brown, a Dallas-based online activist who has worked with Anonymous, referring to backers of the antipiracy legislation. “The idea is to put pressure on the politicians and companies supporting it.”

The online effort underscores how heated the arguments have become over legislation that may seem like arcane government regulation. Media companies say the legislation, which has bipartisan support, will crack down on illicit downloads of movies, music and television, especially from overseas Web sites. SOPA would expand the ability of the government and private companies to hold Web sites responsible for content the companies believe infringes on their copyrights, allowing greater use of court orders and lawsuits that could ultimately shut down the sites.

The technology industry, including giants like Google and Yahoo, and advocates for Internet freedom say the bills would censor the Internet, stifle free speech and give the government too much power to regulate and shut down Web sites in the United States. Both sides have spent millions on lobbying in Washington. But at the grass-roots level, the issue has galvanized Internet activists, who lack lobbying power but have promoted the cause among the online community.

“You take our speech, you take our Internet, you take our Bill of Rights, you take our Constitution, we fight back,” said a monotone voice on a YouTube video posted by Anonymous before the Operation Hiroshima document drop.

Lawmakers and their aides have also been targets. A photograph of a 25-year-old aide for the House Judiciary Committee was superimposed into pornography by a group related to Anonymous, according to another aide who was briefed on security threats to lawmakers and their staffs. “Why can’t they just hire a lobbyist like everyone else?” this aide said.

The vast majority of SOPA opponents convey their views through legitimate means. Hundreds of Web sites have encouraged blackouts and boycotts to protest the legislation. According to BlackoutSOPA.org, nearly 12,000 users have changed their Twitter profile pictures to a “Stop SOPA” badge.

“The more outrage expressed on the Internet in the coming days, the better,” said Fred Wilson, a managing partner at Union Square Ventures, a venture capital firm and an early investor in Twitter. He said he did not condone threats or “any kind of intimidation” by hackers.

Last month Scribd.com introduced a function that made the words on documents gradually fade away. As they did, a pop-up prompted users to contact their representatives. “Don’t let the Internet vanish before your eyes,” it read.

The tactics have succeeded in some cases. Initially a supporter, the Web hosting company Go Daddy reversed its position on SOPA after Wikipedia and thousands of other Web sites said they would withdraw their domains from the service. “Go Daddy will support it when and if the Internet community supports it,” Warren Adelman, Go Daddy’s chief executive, said in a statement.

Companies like Time Warner, which owns HBO, CNN and the Warner Brothers studio, and Viacom, which owns MTV and the Paramount studio, have experienced security teams, but they are not necessarily trained to handle anonymous online threats, said Josh Shaul, chief technology officer at Application Security Inc., a New York-based provider of database security software.

“It’s easy to get something taken off a Web site, but it’s impossible to erase things off the Internet,” he said.

Less than a week after the Operation Hiroshima documents were posted, a Twitter message linking to Mr. Bewkes’s home phone numbers and addresses, his annual income and his wife’s name and age had spread across the Internet. The message included #OpHiroshima, the shortened Twitter code for the effort.

The global activists in the nebulous collection known as Anonymous often use computer skills to support political causes. For example, Anonymous demanded a full Christmas dinner for Pfc. Bradley Manning, the former Army intelligence analyst who is in prison facing charges of leaking classified documents to WikiLeaks.

Last month, hackers associated with Anonymous published a trove of e-mail addresses and the personal information of subscribers of Stratfor, a security group based in Austin, Tex. Last year, a splinter group affiliated with Anonymous attacked the Sony Corporation, shutting down its PlayStation online network. The attack cost the company around $171 million, according to industry estimates. Movements like Anonymous often squabble among themselves, but SOPA is a uniquely unifying cause, said Gabriella Coleman, a professor at McGill University and an expert on hacking. To these activists, she said, “Internet freedom is not controversial.”

0

Clear Channel Radio, the nations largest radio broadcaster, is rebranding itself and yanking the radio from its name — a word that for many years has relegated companies to the status of poor relations amid the broader showbiz landscape.

The new Clear Channel Media and Entertainment said the name change better reflects the evolution of its business, although the core will remain its approximately 850 stations.

Bob Pittman, CEO of parent company Clear Channel, said the radio group has been expanding into new areas. It delivers music, news, talk, sports and other content to auds across multiple platforms that include: broadcast stations; online, HD digital radio channels; satellite; smartphones; iPads and other tablets; in-vehicle entertainment and navigation systems; and via live events.

Over the last few years, Ive watched as Clear Channel Radio has pushed beyond the traditional boundaries of radio to reach more Americans every month than any other media company, said Pittman. We are taking our brands and content wherever our listeners expect to find it.

But radio is both our history and the foundation upon which we will grow our company moving forward. That will not change, said John Hogan, CEO of Clear Channel Media and Entertainment.

Clear Channel said it has 238 million monthly users in the US and Canada. Its Premiere Radio Networks creates and distributes content to 5,000 stations. Katz Media Group is one of the nations leading media sales rep firm in the US for radio and TV stations.

Its new iHeartRadio service offers access to more than 800 live broadcast and digital-only radio stations, and user-created custom stations. Other businesses include Total Traffic Network, and RCS, which provides scheduling and broadcast software for radio, Internet and television station.

Click here for more technology news on Variety.com.

0

One of the biggest complaints I hear about social media is that it takes too much time to manage. As entrepreneurs, we are already strapped for time and adding one more thing to the To Do list can sound nearly impossible.

But managing your social media presence doesn’t have to feel like another obligation, and it certainly doesn’t have to derail your day. There are simple strategies you can use to make it as efficient as possible–and you just might find you enjoy building your audience with this powerful platform.

I’m a big believer in small businesses maximizing their presence on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. If you’re going to use one network, you really should learn to use them all because you’ll have a better chance of building a broad audience. Following are some strategies to manage your time and maximize your success on all three networks.

Improve Time Across All Social Networks

First of all, you should know that your blog is really the heart of your social media strategy (and if you don’t have a blog, please heed my advice and add one to your site ASAP). Each new blog post that you add should be shared with all of your networks by simply posting the title and link back to the post. This is a wonderful way to engage your audience and bring traffic back to your site.

You can simplify this process of sharing content by using a tool like Hootsuite (http://hootsuite.com), which makes it easy to send out announcements to Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn–all at the same time, or one at a time. Best of all, you can pre-schedule your posts to go out at intervals that you specify. This is one of the biggest time-savers out there, not to mention an excellent way to ensure that you share new content on a regular basis.

Save Time on Facebook

It is easy to fall down the social media rabbit hole and let time slip away as you surf through your news feed on Facebook. There is so much to see, so many people to connect with, and so much time that can be wasted away. To get a better grip on time management here, impose limits on your activity. You should be checking in on your professional Facebook page several times each day to see if you have any new comments that need your attention, to ask your audience a question, or to share something new. However, the key is to check in quickly and then leave immediately.

I’m not suggesting that you don’t engage with others–you absolutely should do so. But you need to set boundaries for yourself about when you will do that and how much time you will spend there. For example, you might give yourself 20 minutes on your lunch break to surf, respond, and enjoy. But during the rest of your business day, train yourself to stay focused.

You can also monitor your Facebook news feed from your smart phone. This is a great activity to engage in while standing in line for coffee, killing time before a meeting, or waiting for food at a restaurant.

0

Posted at 08:17 AM ET, 01/13/2012
Media news derivatives: Jan. 13
By Erik Wemple

In case you missed it—Jeez, how did the Tennessean manage to scoop the entire Beltway press corps in nailing the story about Johnny Depp and Tim Burton attending a Halloween party at the White House in 2009? Through good local reporting — that’s how.

Also: Stop the nonsense about “keeping Aaron Rodgers off the field.”

Also also: Please let it not be said that the Daily Caller doesn’t run corrections. It did that just this week, reporting that a guy in an argyle sweater didn’t belong to the age demographic into which the Daily Caller originally placed him.

Elsewhere:

?Public awareness that it’s perfectly fine for a person to run a super PAC that supports his business partner has never been higher, thanks to this Stephen Colbert ploy:

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

?Bill O’Reilly takes after ABC for being “dishonest”in characterizing his characterization of Michelle Obama as “angry.” In the segment, O’Reilly says he is “not going to let” this presidential race “degenerate into a race-baiting, media propaganda exposition.” Good thing he has such power!

?Gawker’s Hamilton Nolan makes quick work of an Oklahoma legislator who wants to impose a tax on newspapers.

?Yesterday was Art Brisbane Day at the New York Times. The guy penned a note asking whether the Times should act as a “Truth Vigilante.” On the question of fact-checking, Brisbane wrote:

…how can The Times do this in a way that is objective and fair? Is it possible to be objective and fair when the reporter is choosing to correct one fact over another? Are there other problems that The Times would face that I haven’t mentioned here?

’Course, folks figured that acting as a truth vigilante was already in the paper’s job description. When you’re writing under the banner of the New York Times and you ask such a question, the Internet quickly becomes your torture chamber, courtesy of Salon, Poynter, Romenesko, and many others. Jack Shafer of Reuters ran a bit of interference for Brisbane, essentially editing him:

At the risk of being the ombudsman’s ombudsman, what he was trying to ask his readers was how much time and effort the Times should put in refuting or contesting every flawed expression of “fact” that they come across when writing about newsmakers. Of course, Brisbane did himself no favor by labeling the aggressive refutation of squirrelly facts as “truth vigilantism” in his headline.

But to be fair to Brisbane — and I promise not to make this a habit — I think he was asking how fully reporters must tweeze every utterance spoken by newsmakers. Politics teems with gray areas and half-truths. If a reporter were to investigate every assertion of fact — assuming that that’s possible on deadline — the story he was supposed to be working on would dissolve into pixel dust. Infinite skepticism is swell, but it requires infinite fact-checking, and who has time for that?

Brisbane struggled all day to add clarity and spin to his original post, but Times Executive Editor Jill Abramson sort of had the last word on the the matter when she wrote a little note saying, more or less, Hey Art, we’ve got that covered.

By Erik Wemple
 | 
08:17 AM ET, 01/13/2012

Previous:
New York Times’s only fact-checking problem: It isn’t loud enough

Next:
Colbert finally explains super PACs

Next Page »